Diferencia entre revisiones de «Rule of Rose»
De AbandonWiki
Ir a la navegaciónIr a la búsquedam (Texto reemplaza - '[http://www.gamasutra' a '16px|Gamasutra [http://www.gamasutra') |
|||
Línea 52: | Línea 52: | ||
* Análisis [http://www.justadventure.com/reviews/RuleOfRose/RoR.shtm] [http://www.jeuxvideo.com/articles/0000/00007110-rule-of-rose-test.htm] [http://worthplaying.com/article/2006/7/3/news/34360] [http://ps2.gamezone.com/gzreviews/p29729.htm] | * Análisis [http://www.justadventure.com/reviews/RuleOfRose/RoR.shtm] [http://www.jeuxvideo.com/articles/0000/00007110-rule-of-rose-test.htm] [http://worthplaying.com/article/2006/7/3/news/34360] [http://ps2.gamezone.com/gzreviews/p29729.htm] | ||
* [http://www.gamefaqs.com/ps2/930042-rule-of-rose/faqs Guía y mapas, en gamefaqs.com] | * [http://www.gamefaqs.com/ps2/930042-rule-of-rose/faqs Guía y mapas, en gamefaqs.com] | ||
− | * [http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/2718/thank_heaven_for_little_girls_why_.php Why ''Rule of Rose'' May Be 2006's Most Controversial Game, gamasutra.com] | + | * [[Imagen:Gamasutra.ico.png|16px|Gamasutra]] [http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/2718/thank_heaven_for_little_girls_why_.php Why ''Rule of Rose'' May Be 2006's Most Controversial Game, gamasutra.com] |
{{Juegos}} | {{Juegos}} |